The New York Times interactive class graphic dumps political scientists into the category "Miscellaneous social scientists," while economists and sociologists have their own categories. Where's the love?
« Anthony Lane goes nuts on Yoda | Main | "World's greatest deliberative body" »
May 20, 2005
TrackBack
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d83451d25c69e200d834460d1953ef
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference The Rodney Dangerfield of the social sciences:
Comments
The comments to this entry are closed.
About Me
I am an assistant professor in the Department of Government at Dartmouth College. I received my Ph.D. from the Department of Political Science at Duke University in May 2009 and served as a RWJ Scholar in Health Policy Research at the University of Michigan from 2009-2011. Previously, I co-edited Spinsanity, a non-partisan watchdog of political spin, and co-authored All the President's Spin. My posts here are also frequently cross-posted at HuffPost Pollster and Washington Monthly's Ten Miles Square blog. I also serve as New Hampshire campaign correspondent for Columbia Journalism Review. For more, see my bio or academic website.
Content feeds:
-Blog RSS
-Blog RSS (no Twitter roundups)
-Twitter feed
-Twitter RSSEmail:
bnyhan@yahoo.com
Become a Fan
Recent Posts
- New at CJR: The Elusive Hunt for the 'Real Romney'
- Twitter roundup
- Counterterrorism official smears drone strike critics
- Twitter roundup
- New at CJR: A State of the Union media prebuttal
- New at CJR: The out-of-context quote as gaffe
- Twitter roundup
- New at CJR: Forget the debates
- New at CJR: The New Hampshire expectations game
- Twitter roundup
hmmm, "miscellaneous social scientists" ranked 36th, economists ranked 53rd. i for one beg to differ. tell me who doesn't get no respect again? well, we can both be glad it's the sociologists...
Posted by: ben | May 22, 2005 at 07:09 PM
hey!! i take offense to that.
Posted by: michaela | May 24, 2005 at 03:06 PM