His scathing new comic about the political aftermath of Katrina is well worth sitting through a brief Salon advertisement. Brutal and hilarious. (Via Alterman.)
« Alterman's anti-Bush jargon | Main | Michael Moore's Katrina jargon »
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d83451d25c69e200d8348af5c969e2
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Read Tom Tomorrow:
The comments to this entry are closed.
I am an assistant professor in the Department of Government at Dartmouth College. I received my Ph.D. from the Department of Political Science at Duke University in May 2009 and served as a RWJ Scholar in Health Policy Research at the University of Michigan from 2009-2011. Previously, I co-edited Spinsanity, a non-partisan watchdog of political spin, and co-authored All the President's Spin. My posts here are also frequently cross-posted at HuffPost Pollster and Washington Monthly's Ten Miles Square blog. I also serve as New Hampshire campaign correspondent for Columbia Journalism Review. For more, see my bio or academic website.
Content feeds:
-Blog RSS
-Blog RSS (no Twitter roundups)
-Twitter feed
-Twitter RSS
Email:
bnyhan@yahoo.com
How is this not more of the same "jargon" that Eric Alterman used? Only now it is "hilarious"? This cartoon suggests that our reasons to invade Iraq are as flimsy as invading Iran because of the hurricane. Of course it is not true and does nothing to raise political discourse and only appeals to the partisans anyway.
Give me Doonsebury, Tony Auth, Jeff Danziger and Tom Toles instead.
http://www.uclick.com/client/nyt/tt/
Posted by: John | September 06, 2005 at 04:08 PM
Heh, i was going to say the same thing, John. I think that the difference is that Tom Tomorrow is evidently using satire and Alterman is not. But it's important that the satire is obvious.
Tom Toles tends to be a little too unsubtle for my taste.
Posted by: rone | September 10, 2005 at 03:03 AM