« Jihadist/Nazi comparisons from Beck, Olver | Main | Bruce Bartlett v. homeless person? »

August 08, 2007

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d83451d25c69e200e39338703a8834

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Hillary: Not a "winner":

» The World Heavyweight Champion... of Politics from Snarkmarket
I like the analogy of politicians as prizefighters (it's near the end of the post). Well, actually: I don't like it, but I suspect it might possess some truth.... [Read More]

Comments

All right, so maybe the Democratic candidates aren't winners. But Clinton is a veteran whiner, and Edwards is a champion wiener. Isn't that close enough?

Shouldn't that be four wins total for the Democrats, counting Obama's election? One extra win for the Republicans, spread among three candidates, doesn't seem like an overwhelming advantage.

Thanks; the error is corrected above. And yes, the Republicans are relatively unproven too.

I'm glad someone FINALLY took a look at Hillary's record as a politician on her own... not as a candidate's spouse.

Obama has had several hard primary elections for state senate... more hard elections than any other candidate in the field.

So, Mr. Nyhan, will you take the IAT test or not? I'd love to see the results.

Maybe you'll be as utterly unbiased as you think you are. But maybe you won't.

Wouldn't it be interesting to learn?

The comments to this entry are closed.