A useful Reuters story points out that civility in campaigns may actually be harmful -- conflict sharpens choices for voters and helps hold those in power responsible for their actions. Along those lines, it's good to see that the lame debate among the Democratic candidates may finally be heating up. Voters deserve a choice on issues, not just a referendum on Hillary's persona.
« McCain joins Giuliani in attack on dissent | Main | More misleading tax cut claims »
September 19, 2007
TrackBack
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d83451d25c69e200e54ef5a59b8834
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference The Democrats need less civility:
Comments
The comments to this entry are closed.
About Me
I am an assistant professor in the Department of Government at Dartmouth College. I received my Ph.D. from the Department of Political Science at Duke University in May 2009 and served as a RWJ Scholar in Health Policy Research at the University of Michigan from 2009-2011. Previously, I co-edited Spinsanity, a non-partisan watchdog of political spin, and co-authored All the President's Spin. My posts here are also frequently cross-posted at HuffPost Pollster and Washington Monthly's Ten Miles Square blog. I also serve as New Hampshire campaign correspondent for Columbia Journalism Review. For more, see my bio or academic website.
Content feeds:
-Blog RSS
-Blog RSS (no Twitter roundups)
-Twitter feed
-Twitter RSSEmail:
bnyhan@yahoo.com
Become a Fan
Recent Posts
- New at CJR: The Elusive Hunt for the 'Real Romney'
- Twitter roundup
- Counterterrorism official smears drone strike critics
- Twitter roundup
- New at CJR: A State of the Union media prebuttal
- New at CJR: The out-of-context quote as gaffe
- Twitter roundup
- New at CJR: Forget the debates
- New at CJR: The New Hampshire expectations game
- Twitter roundup
Obviously, negative advertising doesn't have to be true. So calling it "neative information" is really misleading.
Posted by: Sean-B | September 19, 2007 at 08:03 PM