« Twitter roundup | Main | Twitter roundup »
The comments to this entry are closed.
I am an assistant professor in the Department of Government at Dartmouth College. I received my Ph.D. from the Department of Political Science at Duke University in 2009 and served as a RWJ Scholar in Health Policy Research at the University of Michigan from 2009-2011. I also tweet at @BrendanNyhan and serve as a media critic for Columbia Journalism Review. Previously, I co-edited Spinsanity, a non-partisan watchdog of political spin, and co-authored All the President's Spin. For more, see my bio or academic website.
Content feeds:
-Blog RSS
-Twitter feed
-Twitter RSS
Email:
bnyhan@yahoo.com
Of course, Tea Party members actually stand for limiting the size of government, the amount of government spending, and taxes. Ideally, they'd like to roll government back to where it was a couple of years ago.
So, how effective is it to paint them as Nazis, racists, radicals, extremists or even terrorists? Although these are awful charges, they're so baseless and preposterous that as people learn more about the Tea Parties, these charges ought to lose all effectiveness. OTOH if the New York Times and other mainstream media keep the charges alive, I suppose a certain number of people will believe them.
Posted by: David in Cal | September 20, 2010 at 04:35 PM
well, firstly, a nazi swastika wants to be turning to the right... just like the tea party (just saying they'd like the country to turn to the right, too...)
Posted by: greg anthony benjamin | September 20, 2010 at 09:00 PM
Way to represent!
Posted by: JP | September 21, 2010 at 02:02 AM
When you desire achievements as badly as you desired the air, then you're going to get it. That's the secret to triumph. Do you believe so?
Posted by: New Balance 574 | September 24, 2010 at 08:50 PM