« Upcoming AARP Michigan forum on misinformation | Main | Twitter roundup »

March 21, 2011

Comments

Given that Kate Zernike would unfairly smear Larry Summers, a liberal Democrat, one shouldn't be surprised that she tarred the Tea Parties as racist -- so racist that no defense can wipe that blemish away from them. She wrote in a New York Times news story:

Even if Tea Party members are right that any racist signs are those of mischief-makers, even if Glenn Beck had chosen any other Saturday to hold his rally, it would be hard to quiet the argument about the Tea Party and race. http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2010/08/nyts_zernike_tea_party_racist.html

Of course, this nasty nonsense reflects badly on the New York Times as well on Zernike.

What is it about Fox News that disrupts the thought process of liberal critics?

Two weeks ago, Brendan endorsed the claim of someone named Ryan Chittum regarding the ratio of transfer payments to wages. In fact, Fox's report was accurate and Chittum exposed himself as an econonic naif.

Today, Brendan endorses a silly assertion by Erik Rising, who asks:

So now we're asking the American people to assess the intentions of public officials? Is this really something they're equipped to do?

The answer to Rising's rhetorical question is that democracy routinely demands that American voters assess the intention of public officials. Whenever an official claims to support a certain position, voters naturally must decide whether the candidate really intends to take action on that issue or whether he's merely paying lip service.

It seems that people who believe that Fox News is inaccurate or unreasonable become even more certain of their belief when presented with accurate, reasonable reporting by Fox. Someone ought to write a research paper about this phenomenon. :)

Perhaps the unfair treatment of of Lawrence Summers by Kate Zernike and by the New York Times is an instance of what Lee Stranahan calls "lockstep liberalism." http://leestranahan.com/?p=1132

Stranahan is a liberal who says he discovered that whenever he went against the mainstream liberal agenda, there was a smackdown by liberals, including insults and a refusal to face facts. Zernike's mistreatment of Summers seems to fit this pattern.

Another possible example is an article in the LA Times that mentions "last year's messy firing of conservative commentator Juan Williams." http://www.latimes.com/news/opinion/commentary/la-oe-daum-npr-20110317,0,4077099.column

Williams is actually a liberal who deviated from the mainstream liberal agenda by confessing a fear of Muslims.

Do these statistical models include the possibility of Obama finding the ring? I think that would influence the outcome.

Presumably Brendan is being sarcastic when he labels as "great" the survey question about whether to put money in a bank, stocks, gold, or under your mattress. The first three alternatives sound reasonable to me. They reflect how one feels about the likelihood of inflation and whether one expects economic expansion or recession. So I would guess that Brendan's objection is to the last alternative.

IMHO putting one's money under a mattress is a silly thing to do, but that doesn't make it a silly question. Sixteen percent of responders chose the mattress option. It's worth knowing that one American in six prefers to put money under the mattress rather than put it in a bank, where it would be safer and would earn interest.

Incidentally, I interpreted the phrase "under the mattress" to mean stored in one's home. I think the 16% who chose this option don't want the risk of gold or stocks, and, for some inexplicable reason, don't want to use banks either.

This seems to be another case of unfair criticism of Fox News.

Politico says Media Matters is making war on Fox News:

Media Matters' war against Fox

The liberal group Media Matters has quietly transformed itself in preparation for what its founder, David Brock, described in an interview as an all-out campaign of “guerrilla warfare and sabotage” aimed at the Fox News Channel.

The group, launched as a more traditional media critic, has all but abandoned its monitoring of newspapers and other television networks and is narrowing its focus to Fox and a handful of conservative websites...

Recently Brendan has picked up several examples of supposed Fox misdeeds, which were not misdeeds at all. I suspect these may have been the indirect result of MM's war on Fox.

The comments to this entry are closed.