The Democratic presidential candidates covered a lot of ground during their debate Tuesday, but one issue received little attention: their theory of political change. How exactly would Hillary Rodham Clinton or her rivals pass the programs and proposals they advocate?
« New NYT: Deflategate polarization & conspiracy beliefs | Main | New NYT: The limits of the tobacco strategy on climate »
October 15, 2015
The comments to this entry are closed.
About Me
I am a Professor in the Department of Government at Dartmouth College. I received my Ph.D. from the Department of Political Science at Duke University and served as a RWJ Scholar in Health Policy Research at the University of Michigan before coming to Dartmouth. I also tweet at @BrendanNyhan and serve as a contributor to The Upshot at The New York Times. Previously, I served as a media critic for Columbia Journalism Review, co-edited Spinsanity, a non-partisan watchdog of political spin, and co-authored All the President's Spin. For more, see my Dartmouth website.
Content feeds:
-Blog RSS
-Twitter feed
-Twitter RSS
Email:
bnyhan@yahoo.com
Recent Posts
- New Bright Line Watch survey results
- New NYT: Why Puerto Rico misperceptions matter
- New Politico Magazine: Why norms matter
- New Vox interview on Trump's misinformation
- On the Media interview on the backfire effect
- Trumpcast interview on the President's dishonesty
- New NYT: Is Trump's base support exaggerated?
- New Bright Line Watch survey results
- NHPR interview on liberal conspiracy theories
- New NYT: How marching for science risks politicizing it
Comments