« Bush approval dropping | Main | Report confirms pre-war Iraq spin »

March 28, 2005


Call it the "nukular option", that sounds more appropriate.

I think you have a serious forest for the trees problem here. Move-on's rhetorical excess aside, do you see nothing wrong with the Republicans exercising the "nuclear option" for 10 controversial judicial nominees (out of 200 some that have been accepted)? Do you not believe that the debate over coming Supreme Court nominees is an important one? Just curious. Perhaps you should try addressing the merits of these rather serious issues rather than tediously documenting the rhetorical excess of the partisans.

The comments to this entry are closed.