« Down in the polls, Bush brings back 9/11 | Main | The AP scorches GOP over Tobin »

August 12, 2005

Comments

Corr != caus and all that, but the real error is the lack of citation. No doubt researchers at the University of Michigan are hip to causality and research design. They either exhibited some controls to test causality, made highly qualified claims of causality, or said nothing about causality and were misrepresented by the article.

It's possible that dining together imparts the sense of coherent family structure on young minds, allowing them more secure development and hence successful lives. Wouldn't be surprizing; I'd like to see some evidence for or against that (I have kids).

A citation, even partial (author name, journal and issue, even the actual year of publication!), would allow clarification.

I think the point is that eating together as a family encourages conversation and involvement - but, as you say, if parents are trying to create communication and involvement, dinnertime is merely one tool of many.

One tool of many, perhaps. But still causal. Pushing a glass off a table will cause it to break, even though a physicist understands that its mass, susceptibility to gravity, fragility, and forceful interaction with the hard floor are more proximate culprits.

If communication and involvement are the key (just a hypothesis, and a testable one), they may explain how family dinner causes successful children (again assuming it does). But that doesn't diminish the causal statement.

The comments to this entry are closed.