Washingtonpost.com's Dan Froomkin flags two examples of one of my least favorite types of presidential journalism:
Richard Wolffe and Holly Bailey write for Newsweek: "President Bush looked pained. His hair was grayer than usual, his skin more washed out. The lines under his eyes were deeply scored. If that's what victory looks like, you wouldn't want to see defeat."
New York Times TV critic Alessandra Stanley writes: "The president, whose political identity is founded on an image of unwavering cowboy resolve, looked uncertain and chastened behind the lectern, at one moment staring downward and gnawing his lip in a rare tableau of weary anxiety."
The way Bush looks tell us very little. Every president looks exhausted by their sixth year in office. Moreover, interpreting how someone looks is completely subjective. The typical pattern is to use some visual cue to reinforce whatever narrative is dominant at the time. In this case, Bush's ratings are down and his party is in trouble, so he's portrayed as looking tired and chastened. When he's winning, he's described as confident, energetic, etc. In general, it's a bankrupt form of analysis.
Just came across your blog, putting the family name in google. It's great to see someone from the family doing the important job of keeping an eye on the corporate journalists.
Keep of the good work.
Regards.
Damon Nyhan
Posted by: Damon Nyhan | November 01, 2006 at 05:19 AM
Oh I don't know, it's probably about as valid as Barron's financial analysis of the mid-terms.
Posted by: Seth | November 01, 2006 at 03:41 PM
It's not so much that these observations are revealing or not, I think noting how a person looks and acts can be very revealing, but that there is no objective standard for analizing the observations. It is fine for an op-ed or gossip column or water cooler talk or on a blog but leave it out of the journalistic reporting. As you say it is too subjective. Instead give me a little reporting about the republican attempt to defang pose comitatus and the Insurrection Act please. And fire that hack Halperin at ABC. They have really gone to the dogs over there.
Posted by: Paul | November 02, 2006 at 12:15 AM