« Warner not running, Edwards gains | Main | Predicted Bush approval in November »

October 13, 2006

Comments

Here's what I don't understand about this: I didn't think that he DID stand for his own swiftboating. He had more Vietnam vets stand up in his defense, supporting his version of events, than those who were doing the swiftboating. He held press conferences denouncing those men, and their credibility was pretty much shot not long after they attacked him. Yet, thanks to the press, the story took on an unbelievable life of its own. What was he SUPPOSED to do that he didn't do?

Raleighite: He was supposed to fight back immediately instead of letting it fester and letting the opposition frame his character before he'd had a chance to do so.

This seems like SwiftBoating v 2.0 to me: Kerry's a wimp (or, since we're all careful wordsmiths here, "unintentionally hilarious") because he didn't react quickly enough to a dishonorable sliming once upon a time. Therefore he's disqualified from correcting the mistake the next time it occurs?

The comments to this entry are closed.