« Would Jesus vote for Mitt Romney? | Main | Kos's "strong Democrat" fallacy on MTP »

August 12, 2007

Comments

Of course, there's no evidence that Bush has allowed bin Laden to evade capture.

Well, there is the fact that we haven't captured him.

Also, its clear that Reid means the President prioritized invading Iraq ahead of capturing Bin Laden. He isn't making a claim about Bush's motives, he is remarking on Bush's failures.

I have to agree with talboito. Reid is claiming a bad decision is affecting our efforts to find bin Laden. Not providing our military enough resources to find bin Laden is a legitimate gripe. The President has tied Iraq to the war on terror, but there is no "surge" to find bin Laden.

The comments to this entry are closed.