« How did Saletan miss Rushton's background? | Main | Diana Mutz on "in-your-face" TV debate »

November 30, 2007


I wonder if part of it is because he was talking about New York and the Times has direct, unmediated experience with what he was lying about. Maybe it's about confidence.

You can bet (d) is not a correct answer, as the NY Times article mentioned in this post is the first evidence I've seen of critical reporting about Republicans.

The comments to this entry are closed.