« The narratives of election smears | Main | Converging to election fundamentals »

August 20, 2008


Very interesting post. It's difficult to be certain of conclusions because the analysis uses post hoc ergo propter hoc reasoning. In particular, even though Carter's popularity fell after the debates with Gerald Ford, I think his popularity would have fallen even more if Ford hadn't made his "no domination of Eastern Europe" blunder.

I can't prove my opinion, but this analysis doesn't really disprove it, either.

The comments to this entry are closed.