Andrew Gelman notes that the political scientists Robert S. Erikson and Christopher Wlezien have released a paper projecting an Obama win with 53% of the two-party presidential vote based on leading economics indicators and current trial heat polling. The economist Ray Fair, who has a well-known model that I've criticized in the past (see this Larry Bartels paper [PDF] for more), updated his projection on July 31 and now predicts that Obama will get 51.5% of the two-party vote. The more respected Bread and Peace model of Douglas Hibbs projects an Obama win with 52% of the two-party vote.
While these may seem like relatively narrow projected victories, Gelman notes in a separate post that incumbent parties rarely lose the popular vote by more than a few points. This may be encouraging to the Democrats who think Obama "should" have a bigger lead in the polls right now given the favorable political environment. On the other hand, it highlights the incredible tightrope he has to walk as the first African American presidential nominee of a major party. If Obama's race costs him more than a point or two in the polls (something the above models cannot forecast and do not incorporate), it's likely to be decisive.
BTW, Barack's not the first black presidential candidate, nor is he the only black presidential candidate right now. Alan Keyes is running as an Independent Candidate backed by the newly formed America's Independent Party National Committee. It's the largest third party in the nation based on voter registration.
If you're a Reagan-Conservative, check out the platform at: www.SelfGovernment.US and vote Alan Keyes in '08.
Thanks!
Posted by: Savvy | August 04, 2008 at 02:07 AM
If you're ANY sort of conservative, check out www.SelfGovernment.US and vote Alan Keyes in '08.
Posted by: Mark D. | August 04, 2008 at 09:22 AM
Aren't these predicters the same clowns who had Al Gore winning with almost 60% of the vote in 2000?
Posted by: Maestroh | September 09, 2008 at 01:12 AM