Karl Rove is again pushing the suggestion that Barack Obama is lazy, a claim that connotes ugly racial stereotypes about African Americans.
Back in September of last year, a "senior White House official" (apparently Rove) accused Obama of "intellectual laziness" in an interview with Bill Sammon of The Examiner:
As for Obama, a senior White House official said the freshman senator from Illinois was "capable" of the intellectual rigor needed to win the presidency but instead relies too heavily on his easy charm.
"It's sort of like, 'that's all I need to get by,' which bespeaks sort of a condescending attitude towards the voters," said the official, speaking on condition of anonymity. "And a laziness, an intellectual laziness."
He cited an example from Obama's memoir, The Audacity of Hope, in which the senator complains that many "government programs don't work as advertised." Five days after the book was published last fall, Obama was asked to name some of those government programs by Tim Russert on NBC's "Meet the Press."
"And he can't give an example," the official said. "Look, if you wrote the book, you should have thought through what it was. But he's sitting there, fumbling around."
Then, in a January Wall Street Journal op-ed, Rove described Obama as "often lazy":
Mr. Obama has failed to rise to leadership on a single major issue in the Senate. In the Illinois legislature, he had a habit of ducking major issues, voting "present" on bills important to many Democratic interest groups, like abortion-rights and gun-control advocates. He is often lazy, given to misstatements and exaggerations and, when he doesn't know the answer, too ready to try to bluff his way through.
Most recently, Rove revived the meme in a WSJ op-ed Thursday that suggested Obama needs to answer doubts that he is "intellectually lazy" at the convention:
Mr. Obama, on the other hand, needs to reassure Americans he is up to the job. Voters recognize he represents change, yet they are unsettled. Does he have the experience to be president? There are growing concerns, which the McCain campaign has tapped, that Mr. Obama is an inexperienced celebrity-politician smitten with his own press clippings.
And is there really a "there" there? Besides withdrawing from Iraq, it's not clear what issues are really important to him. Does he do his homework or is he intellectually lazy? Is there an issue on which he would do the unpopular thing or break with party orthodoxy? Is his candidacy about important answers or simply about us being the "change we've been waiting for"? Substance will help diminish concerns about his heft and fitness for the job.
Unfortunately, Obama's campaign has to expect that code words and innuendo will increasingly be used to inflame racial stereotypes in this way. It's shameful if not surprising.
So...is a white person somehow no longer allowed to say that a black person is lazy? What if a white person actually thought that Obama was lazy? How could he express that without being labeled a racist?
Posted by: Jeff | August 25, 2008 at 01:46 AM
Rove deserves some credit for providing examples of the trait he's criticizing. IMHO it is reasonable to ask why so able a man can point to so few public policy achievements. However, I don't think the problem is intellectual laziness. I think the answer is that Obama is self-centered.
As a student, as a candidate and as an author, Obama has worked diligently. He has had great personal success in these areas. OTOH, when it comes to public policy issues, he seems to have been less committed.
Posted by: David | August 25, 2008 at 01:50 AM
Jeff, you are correct, there are some subjects it's apparently verboten for anyone to mention. For example, Obama enjoys playing basketball. Obama plays basketball on the campaign trail. Obama has photographers take pictures of him playing basketball on the campaign trail. But if
Republicans run an ad showing Obama playing basketball, that's an appeal to racial stereotypes and prejudice. Crazy, isn't it?
Posted by: Rob | August 25, 2008 at 08:49 AM
As far as Jeff's comment, you could certainly imagine circumstances where the use of the word could be appropriate for an individual of any race. The problem is that the evidence for Obama being lazy is so thin and the strategic incentives for Republicans to use coded language are so powerful. Obama is the former editor of the Harvard Law Review who has written two books, been a top lawyer and instructor in the law, risen to the top of American politics in a very short period of time, and defeated a formidable Democratic frontrunner in the Democratic primaries. That's not someone who most people would consider "lazy" intellectually or otherwise. And yet Rove happens to choose that word, which activates racial stereotypes. As I always point out, I can't know what is going on in his head. But it's hard to see how this is just a race-neutral description that Rove happened to come up with.
Posted by: Brendan Nyhan | August 25, 2008 at 09:25 AM
David:
Talk about LAZY--OTOH??????
Posted by: Petrie Dish | August 25, 2008 at 11:56 AM
When I think of lazy I think of Bush, Mr. Vacation and very incurious.
Rove had the best quote of this election so far:
"He's the guy at the country club with the beautiful date, holding a martini and a cigarette that stands against the wall and makes snide comments about everyone who passes by."
Huh?
Posted by: Peter K. | August 25, 2008 at 05:03 PM
Brendan,
I've followed your writings since Spinasity, even though it appears we would disagree on many things, so I am sad to see you head this direction - where it seems anything a political opponent person says about Obama must be a coded racial slur.
Call him "lazy", it's obviously code for racism.
Call him "hard working", it's still a code for racism, since the speaker obviously think most blacks are not.
Doesn't anyone remember the uproar when Biden called Obama "articulate"?
Can it not be that Rove actually thinks Obama is indeed "intellectually lazy"? Must it be construed as a slur?
I have to say I am disappointed.
Posted by: MartyB | August 25, 2008 at 05:52 PM
I don't know about lazy, but I think Obama is a serial liar. Whether it was 20 years in Trinity and not knowing about Wright's racism, his denying he favored partial birth abortion, his deflection and understatement and withholding information on his association with that scrawny 60's fossil, William Ayers, Obama comes through as disingenuous and a liar.
Posted by: Jim | August 31, 2008 at 02:20 AM