« Margin of error alert: The Pelosi/Cheney poll | Main | The slippery slope of MA state holidays »
The comments to this entry are closed.
I am the James O. Freedman Presidential Professor in the Department of Government at Dartmouth College. I received my Ph.D. from the Department of Political Science at Duke University and have served as a RWJ Scholar in Health Policy Research and a faculty member in the Ford School of Public Policy at the University of Michigan. I also tweet at @BrendanNyhan, contribute to The Upshot at The New York Times, and am a co-organizer of Bright Line Watch. Previously, I served as a media critic for Columbia Journalism Review, co-edited Spinsanity, a non-partisan watchdog of political spin, and co-authored All the President's Spin. For more, see my Dartmouth website.
Content feeds:
-Blog RSS
-Twitter feed
-Twitter RSS
Email:
bnyhan@yahoo.com
One reason the US News ratings can be gamed is because they're indirect. By comparison, Consumer Reports rates automobiles based on handling, fuel economy, reliability, comfort, etc. The only way for an automobile company to improve its CR rating is to build a better car. US News gives 10% weight to Expenditures per Student. GM beats Honda and Toyota in expenditures per car, but nobody thinks that's something to boast about.
An ideal rating for a college would begin with what the students learn. That's hard to measure, so learning is not included in the rating.
One result is that "buyers" (high school seniors and parents) make important purchasing decisions involving as much as $200,000 based on quite limited information. OTOH many HS students and parents may not really know what they want from college (other than a diploma), so it may not matter much what they do get.
Posted by: David | June 07, 2009 at 11:46 AM