David Leonhardt of the New York Times has written the single best overview of the political and policy challenges facing the Obama administration in its efforts to reform health care -- it's well worth a read.
« Obama's approval drop not surprising | Main | Disturbing growth in "birther" movement »
The comments to this entry are closed.
I am the James O. Freedman Presidential Professor in the Department of Government at Dartmouth College. I received my Ph.D. from the Department of Political Science at Duke University and have served as a RWJ Scholar in Health Policy Research and a faculty member in the Ford School of Public Policy at the University of Michigan. I am a co-director of Bright Line Watch. Previously, I contributed to The Upshot at The New York Times, served as a media critic for Columbia Journalism Review, co-edited Spinsanity, a non-partisan watchdog of political spin, and co-authored All the President's Spin. For more, see my Dartmouth website.
Content feeds:
-Blog RSS
-Bluesky
-Threads
Email:
[email protected]
I give Obama credit for winning the battle of the name. Health care "reform" automatically implies "the improvement or amendment of [health care that] is wrong, corrupt, unsatisfactory, etc." (Def. 1 in dictionary.com)
Opponents are now trying to substitute "reckless experiment" for the word "reform." I think the substitute is at least as accurate. However, IMHO the opponents have lost this battle. Health care "reform" is the widely-accepted, official name.
Posted by: David | July 22, 2009 at 07:17 PM
I've found David Leonhardt's columns to be startling fresh. See especially his article on the budget deficit, and his previous article regarding health care rationing. It's good to see some journalists who are willing to call a spade a spade.
Posted by: David | July 22, 2009 at 09:14 PM
Plus, he's willing to call a Bernie a snot.
Posted by: Howard Craft | July 23, 2009 at 11:02 AM