From my Twitter feed (3/14-3/17)Mar 17, 2011 at 7:00 PM | |
---|---|
Powered by Keepstream | |
![]() | .@AdamSerwer on mistaken calls for Obama to use bully pulpit on gun control http://j.mp/i6B37m |
![]() | |
Mar 17, 2011 at 3:22 PM | |
![]() | Disturbing: Gawker on how WP now helps you "segregate yourself in the opinion ghetto of your choice" http://j.mp/ibsCUf (via @jayrosen_nyu) |
Mar 16, 2011 at 9:29 PM | |
![]() | Pundits tend to overthink Elec College-few races close enough for EC to matter http://j.mp/fY4xUo Still, '12 might be one http://j.mp/evvk26 |
http://j.mp/fY4xUo | |
| |
Mar 16, 2011 at 4:35 PM | |
![]() | A review of the latest neuroscience research on responses to racial and political outgroups http://j.mp/gvpeqz (PDF) |
http://cn.isr.umich.edu/Papers/Falk_2010_BeliefandTheNeuralBasisofAttitudes.pdf | |
Mar 16, 2011 at 3:20 PM | |
![]() | See also http://j.mp/e6CLm7 RT @davidhawkings GRAPHIC: Breakdown of vote against short-term spending resolution. http://roll.cl/dI9sAH |
House Vote 179 - H.J.RES.48: On Passage - NYTimes.com Keep track of congressional roll call votes and members' most recent positions on roll call votes. | |
http://roll.cl/dI9sAH | |
Mar 16, 2011 at 2:46 PM | |
![]() | Will libs ever realize CFR helped create outside groups they hate (e.g. Kochs)? http://j.mp/hJUems Entirely predictable: http://j.mp/hYqpe8 |
How McCain-Feingold Empowered the Kochs | FrumForum McCain-Feingold hoped to limit the influence of money in politics. Instead, it may have just shifted power to donors like the Koch Brothers. | |
The wrong interpretation of campaign finance "reform" - Brendan Nyhan | |
Mar 16, 2011 at 2:02 PM | |
![]() | New WP poll: Palin increasingly polarizing even among GOP (58/37 fav/unfav), while Romney up from '08 http://j.mp/gwbipb (via @postpolls) |
![]() | |
Mar 16, 2011 at 1:07 PM | |
![]() | 25% of Republican voters think that an organization that no longer exists will be able to steal a presidential election http://bit.ly/dKTXbu |
![]() | |
Mar 15, 2011 at 7:06 PM | |
![]() | RT @jamisonfoser Actual CNN Poll Q: "would you say that Charlie Sheen has mostly been winning or mostly been losing?" http://bit.ly/f3ALHQ |
![]() | |
Mar 15, 2011 at 11:24 PM | |
![]() | Fantastic article RT @davidhawkings Computers can fine-tune redistricting, but can't overcome changes in voting patterns http://j.mp/ihbw5Y |
![]() | |
Mar 15, 2011 at 2:31 PM | |
![]() | MT @Atul_Gawande In SC. Tomorrow we launch coalition to slash surgery deaths statewide w/checklist in every hospital: http://j.mp/icSNs9 |
Home The South Carolina Safe Sugery 2015 Program launches March 16,2010 in Columbia South Carolina | |
Mar 15, 2011 at 1:17 PM | |
![]() | How public & elite misperceptions about fiscal policy interact to produce an excessive focus on deficits during downturns http://j.mp/g9maag |
![]() | |
Mar 15, 2011 at 12:58 PM | |
![]() | .@bpump on the consequences of the total breakdown of legislative norms in Wisconsin -- highly recommended http://bit.ly/hgVYsd |
No More Norms in Wisconsin — Barry Pump's Blog Wisconsin Politics reports that State Senate Majority Leader Scott Fitzgerald has told his committee chairs that Democrats have no voting rights because they are still held in contempt by the ch... | |
Mar 15, 2011 at 1:02 AM | |
![]() | .@mattyglesias on the research of my friend and coauthor Hans Noel -- pundits matter! http://bit.ly/hwAewz |
![]() | |
Mar 14, 2011 at 10:00 PM | |
![]() | Full transcript of Obama at the Gridiron Club via @jaketapper -- highly amusing: http://j.mp/eP1jSC |
![]() | |
Mar 14, 2011 at 4:24 PM | |
![]() | Journalists who understand the importance of the economy for 2012 -- @ezraklein: http://j.mp/fVll6j and @daveweigel: http://j.mp/i57AOp |
Ezra Klein - What matters for 2012 today ... | |
Weigel : Please Note: Voters Are Angry Because They Want Jobs This Vandehei/Allen thumbsucker about the ways budget-cutters are defining the 2012 GOP presidential race is worth reading, and it drives home a few essential things that keep getting missed. Bu... | |
Mar 14, 2011 at 3:24 PM | |
![]() | Belated props to George Will for his full-throated denunciation of birtherism and attacks on Obama as anti-American http://j.mp/flTLTk |
![]() | |
Mar 14, 2011 at 3:22 PM | |
![]() | Even his staff's offensive jokes are anachronistic MT @benpolitico In Barbour's shop, jokes abt Janet Reno's gender http://politi.co/ehJkAk |
![]() | |
Mar 14, 2011 at 3:08 PM | |
Like "Attack of the 50 Foot Woman," Brendan's head shot at the left of each tweet is growing, threatening to take over the entire layout. Not since Newt Gingrich became Speaker did anyone's head swell so ominously.
Posted by: Rob | March 17, 2011 at 06:35 PM
Ha. Yes, I'm hoping they give me the option to take out all the head shots. Stay tuned...
Posted by: bnyhan | March 17, 2011 at 08:16 PM
Democratic policies may be failing locally and nationally. And, Democratic politicians may be losing races. But, the liberals retain their ability to demoonize. Liberals like to demean Rush Limbaugh listeners as "dittoheads", who they claim march in lockstep behind Mr. Limbaugh. (That's not how Limbaugh uses the term "dittos", but never mind.) However, the real lockstep followers are liberal demonizers. Once a target is identified -- be it Palin, Gingrich, George W. Bush, Dick Cheney, Rumsfeld, Clarence Thomas, Fox News, etc. -- many liberal pundits and followers will jump into lockstep attacks on the target.
The current example would be the Koch Brothers, who are a strange target.
First of all, they're not really conservative; they're libertarian. Many of the causes they support are on the liberal side, such as the ACLU.
Second, they haven't done anything wrong. They've committed no crime. Their business hasn't been involved in unethical conduct.
Third, they don't give that much money, compared to many who contribute to liberals. E.g., they've been accused of contributing to Gov. Scott Walker in Wisconsin. In fact, they contributed a total of $43,000. That was out of more than $11 million that Walker raised, and $37.4 million that was spent, altogether, on the 2010 race for Governor of Wisconsin. Which means that people associated with Koch Industries contributed a whopping one-tenth of one percent of what was spent on last year's election. http://www.powerlineblog.com/archives/2011/02/028438.php
Here's a chart of large political donors. Note that the Kochs are well down the list. Note also, that the top donor actuualy give entirely or primaarily to Dems. http://www.opensecrets.org/orgs/list.php?type=A
Nevertheless, the left set out to demonize the Koch brothers and they have successfully done so.
Posted by: David in Cal | March 18, 2011 at 12:31 AM
ISTM that Yglesias's blog's first comment nailed the problem with Yglesias's post:
Likely voters KNOW:
1. they are not unemployed themselves.
2. printing money devalues their savings.
3. borrowing money increases future obligations.
Voters are not dumb. They just don't care that much about the things De[Long and] Krugman care about.
I agree with Brendan about Ray Fair. ISTM that Fair also doesn't pay enough attention to point #2 above -- inflation. IMHO inflation will become a dominant issue in the 2012 election. The combination of
-- printing of large amounts of new money ("quantitative easing 2"),
-- the oil shock,
-- the rise in food prices, partly due to the pointless use of corn to make ethanol
-- the Japanese EQ
have combined to make a perfect storm pointing toward inflation. We're not quite seeing it, because most sources show 12 month inflation rates. Inflation has been under control for quite a while, so the year on year figures aren't alarming yet.
However, the Producer Price Index in Dec, 2010, Jan., 2011 and Feb, 2011 grew by 0.9%, 0.8% and 1.6%. These add to 3.3% in 3 months, which equates to an annual rate of over 13%. http://www.bls.gov/news.release/ppi.nr0.htm
If that continues, or even worsens, we will have an economic problem worse than the slow recovery.
Posted by: David in Cal | March 18, 2011 at 01:27 AM
When is humor offensive? Take 2 comparisons:
1. The President joked about the upheavals in the Middle East in which thousands of people have been slaughtered.
An aide to Haley Barbour joked about the Japanese earthquake which killed thousands of people.
2. The President joked about the appearance of Daniels' (short) and Boehner (skin color).
The Barbour aide joked about Reno's appearance (masculine).
To me, these pairs of jokes look roughly parallel. Yet, we are told that the Obama jokes were funny and the Barbour aide's jokes were offensive. Is there a double standard here?
Posted by: David in Cal | March 18, 2011 at 10:26 AM