Twitter roundup (5/12-5/18)May 18, 2011 at 6:41 PM | |
---|---|
Powered by Keepstream | |
![]() | RT @willwilkinson Romney and cognitive dissonance http://econ.st/ijVlaW |
![]() | |
May 18, 2011 at 4:05 PM | |
![]() | Never thought I'd see this. RT @benpolitico: Obama campaign hawking long-form t-shirts http://is.gd/SzEVxq #notparody |
![]() | |
May 18, 2011 at 3:48 PM | |
![]() | "[Cornell] West’s ego, not the health of American democracy, is the wounded creature in this story" http://j.mp/ihqYbZ |
![]() | |
May 18, 2011 at 2:06 PM | |
![]() | Update: Jacksonville City Council candidate endorsed by MC Hammer has a narrow lead going into expected recount http://j.mp/jhbscw |
| |
May 18, 2011 at 1:48 PM | |
![]() | Generic Ballot Polling Review at Stochastic Democracy http://bit.ly/kv0MlS |
![]() | |
May 18, 2011 at 12:49 PM | |
![]() | .@mattyglesias (who should do poli sci) on how the status quo bias of the political system empowers judicial activism http://j.mp/ihaxrQ |
![]() | |
May 17, 2011 at 7:46 PM | |
![]() | Boston Review symposium on fixing Congress with many contributions from political scientists -- recommended http://j.mp/mtafbt |
![]() | |
May 17, 2011 at 4:26 PM | |
![]() | Via John Sides, @leedrutman summarizes new poli sci research into the effects of anger and anxiety http://j.mp/jkO6c3 |
![]() | |
May 17, 2011 at 4:09 PM | |
![]() | Dear Bill Clinton: even an independent government agency is not going to be effective at stopping rumors http://j.mp/iK2bYI |
![]() | |
May 17, 2011 at 4:07 PM | |
![]() | Krugman weighs in on the disappearing Tax Foundation blog post RT @NYTimeskrugman: Apparatchiks http://nyti.ms/igSeKs |
Apparatchiks - NYTimes.com Memory holes don't work like they used to. | |
May 17, 2011 at 1:52 PM | |
![]() | MT @marklotto That @nytimes ran 50+ pieces about Trump in last 2 months goes unmentioned in this media scolding piece http://nyti.ms/iNxrKM |
![]() | |
May 17, 2011 at 12:59 PM | |
![]() | FrumForum's @Noahkgreen reports that a followup Tax Foundation post was also deleted http://j.mp/lJr96S Alternate copy: http://j.mp/myzIQ3 |
Why Did Think Tank Kill Journal Critique? | FrumForum A very large hat-tip goes out to blogger Brendan Nyhan who has noticed that the Tax Foundation has deleted a blog post on their site which was very critical of an editorial graphic published in ... | |
Where the Taxable Income Is, Continued | OcTaxLaw.com Yesterday I wrote a post about a chart that appeared in a Wall Street Journal editorial last month. The chart was nonsense for a variety of reasons, but it | |
May 17, 2011 at 12:57 PM | |
![]() | Dog bites man. RT @SteveKornacki: I was right, Chris Matthews was wrong http://bit.ly/j6xXsH |
![]() | |
May 16, 2011 at 7:20 PM | |
![]() | Zogby claims 11% have doubts OBL is dead, 8% not sure; group skews right and downscale. Caveats apply given the source.http://j.mp/mjh6Rm |
The Daily Number - 19% - WWW.THEDAILY.COM | |
May 16, 2011 at 5:35 PM | |
![]() | "Should Political Scientists Care More About Politics?" http://j.mp/lsx8Z1 See also @smotus: http://j.mp/iIkIT9 |
Should Political Scientists Care More About Politics? — The Monkey Cage Archon Fung says yes in his review of Jacob Hacker and Paul Pierson’s Winner Take All Politics for the Boston Review, and name-checks Lee Sigelman. One might think that the counterweight would c... | |
![]() | |
May 16, 2011 at 12:55 PM | |
![]() | "Antipathy to traditional role of the Fed is...one of the worst intellectual developments... in recent memory" http://j.mp/jVgCW4 |
| |
May 16, 2011 at 12:53 PM | |
![]() | Surprising level of elite interest MT @jonward11 if Daniels gets in it makes TPaw's route tougher http://j.mp/iRuh9k (via @benpolitico) |
![]() | |
May 13, 2011 at 4:53 PM | |
![]() | .@gothamist on Huckabee video of how "Reagan saved America from dangers of debt & knife-wielding thugs in disco t-shirts" http://j.mp/jAOOkq |
![]() | |
May 13, 2011 at 4:47 PM | |
![]() | .@jonathanchait on Romney's "Al Gore Problem": http://j.mp/mF9jFK Here's my take on his Gore-like coverage (from March): http://j.mp/fKqu4i |
![]() | |
| |
May 13, 2011 at 4:32 PM | |
![]() | RT @GrahamDavidA: It looks like @JRubinBlogger is trying to muscle in on Gail Collins' turf with Romney dog jokes: http://j.mp/lbQ7yX |
![]() | |
May 13, 2011 at 4:26 PM | |
![]() | RT @GrahamDavidA: I personally would like @SarahPalinUSA to prove she knows the words to "Rapper's Delight" w/ a primetime FNC rendition: http://j.mp/kksbzN |
![]() | |
May 12, 2011 at 4:11 PM | |
![]() | RT @GOP12: Huntsman starts quest to beat Romney by making same mistakes Romney did in '08--shift right, poll everything http://bit.ly/mUb8DC |
![]() | |
May 12, 2011 at 4:10 PM | |
![]() | Useful comparison to McCain muddling through on immigration RT @SteveKornacki: Why health care may not doom Romney http://bit.ly/lZamIg |
![]() | |
May 12, 2011 at 2:41 PM | |
Matt Yglesias and Brendan believe that judicial activism is on the increase because of America's "unusually cumbersome legislative process." But, is our legislative process really unusually cumbersome? I think not. Just look at all the revolutionary legislation that has been passed recently (for better or for worse).
I came of age during the Eisenhower Adminstration. The only memorable act of Congress during those 8 years was the interstate highway system. Compare that with all that Congress has done in the last few years: Expansion of Medicare to prescription drugs, going to war in Iraq and in Afghanistan, TARP, Obamacare, an enormous "stimulus" that will probably result in a permanent increase in federal government spending, passing and then retaining the Bush tax cuts...to name a few. ISTM that Congress has actually been quite active.
Posted by: David in Cal | May 18, 2011 at 05:27 PM
Brendan, thanks for the link to that odious Krugman column. There are so many lies one hardly knows where to begin.
the Wall Street Journal had a deeply dishonest editorial claiming that taxes on the rich can’t help with out budget problems. (Are you surprised?)
Of course that's not what the WSJ said. That would be ridiculous. They said that taxing the "millionaires and billionaires" (a group that the President had referred to) at 100% of their AGI still wouldn't be enough to balance the budget. And, they supply figures to prove this point. Krugman doesn't dispute this allegation. BTW Krugman doesn't do his readers the courtesy of supplying a link to the WSJ editorial that he's misrepresenting.
Note also that although Krugman calls the editorial "deeply dishonest", he doesn't specify a single example of dishonesty, not even shallow dishonesty.
...chart accompanying the editorial was a classic case of how to lie with numbers
A famous book that everyone should read is How to Lie With Statistics.
That book describes "classic" cases of how to lie with numbers, such as a "gee whiz" graph that cuts off the bottom to make changes appear more dramatic. Or, using 3-dimentional pictures using 1-dimensional ratios to exaggerate differences in magnitude. But, the WSJ chart isn't in that book. The point of the chart is that the amount of money earned by the "millionaires and billionaires" was only a small fraction of the total income. Any revision of the bins would show the same thing. Note also that Krugman doesn't say what revision he thinks would make the chart fair.
Then there Krugman's implication that the Tax Foundation withdrew their article for malign reasons. The Tax Foundation has said that they withdrew the article because its content was incorrect. So, Krugman is also accusing the Tax Foundation of lying. Yet, Krugman has no evidence of why they withdrew the chart. His accusation sounds like those who accused Mr. Obama of withholding his LFBC for malign reasons and lying about the reasons.
The right is saddled with Jerome Corsi and World Net Daily; the left is saddled with Paul Krugman and the New York Times op-ed pages.
Posted by: David in Cal | May 19, 2011 at 12:59 AM