« Twitter roundup | Main | Why are GOP governors unpopular? »

July 21, 2011


IMHO Obama's policies are directly responsible for the slow economic growth. A recent interview with the founder of Home Depot includes three important assertions

1. Excessive regulations are harming job creation
2. Even though taxes are low now, the budget deficit shows businessmen that tax increases are coming.
3. Businessmen fear that the federal government may use agencies like the SEC and the IRS to punish them.

It's not surprising that a political opponent of the President would criticize him this way. However, a few days ago, Democrat Steve Wynn, a man who played a major role in revitalizing Las Vegas, made much the same observations:

[Wynn's] customers and the companies he works with “are frightened of this administration,” he said, “and it makes you slow down and not invest your money. Everybody complains about how much money is on the side in America.”

“Until we change the tempo and the conversation from Washington, it’s not going to change,” added Wynn, according to a transcript of the call’s question-and-answer session. “And those of us who have business opportunities and the capital to do it are going to sit in fear of the president. And a lot of people don’t want to say that. They’ll say, ‘God, don’t be attacking Obama.’ Well, this is Obama’s deal, and it’s Obama that’s responsible for this fear in America.”

Really? This survey by a conservative group of economic forecasters said demand was more important than uncertainty or fear.


Moreover, this survey of small business owners found that poor sales have soared as the reason why they're not selling.


Neither anecdotal evidence nor surveys prove much of anything regarding why the slow economic growth/ unemployment

That said, I found the following graph somewhat stunning in mapping the correlation of Obamacare and employment growth slow-down.


As the author notes, correlation does not prove causation, but this is one of the some of the most startling data I've seen recently.

BTW @Nadia, I would note that "demand" includes "business to business" demand - i.e. business aren't buying thus other businesses aren't selling to them. In addition, consumers not buying could be because they are saving or paying down debt due to - ta-da - uncertainty at their jobs and businesses.

It's becomes a vicious circle. Krugman, being a Nobel Prize winning economist (and former Enron Advisor) knows this as well. Funny he doesn't square the circle.


Nadia, the free portion of your cited WSJ article says the WSJ surveyed "53 economists," but says nothing about the surveyed economists being conservative. Does the hidden part of the article identify the surveyed economists as "conservative"?

The comments to this entry are closed.