Political campaigns are supposed to promise hope and change, but Hillary Clinton is not offering enough of either — one of the most important reasons that she barely won Iowa and lost by a wide margin to Bernie Sanders in New Hampshire.
« New NYT: The downside of dynastic politics | Main | How we got here on Trump: A tweetstorm »
February 10, 2016
The comments to this entry are closed.
About Me
I am the James O. Freedman Presidential Professor in the Department of Government at Dartmouth College. I received my Ph.D. from the Department of Political Science at Duke University and have served as a RWJ Scholar in Health Policy Research and a faculty member in the Ford School of Public Policy at the University of Michigan. I am a co-director of Bright Line Watch. Previously, I contributed to The Upshot at The New York Times, served as a media critic for Columbia Journalism Review, co-edited Spinsanity, a non-partisan watchdog of political spin, and co-authored All the President's Spin. For more, see my Dartmouth website.
Content feeds:
-Blog RSS
-Mastodon feed
Email:
[email protected]
Recent Posts
- UCLA Law panel on threats to democracy
- New podcast - on Mike Pesca's The Gist
- New Bright Line Watch report/interview
- Big Technology podcast interview
- New SciAm: Open the social media black box
- Panel with the Surgeon General on COVID-19 misinfo
- FiveThirtyEight podcast interview
- CBS Sunday Morning interview
- Three new podcast interviews
- New On the Media: The Green Lantern theory
Comments